K N O W N B U G S
I N S E N D M A I L (for 8.8.6)
The following are bugs or deficiencies in sendmail that I am aware of but
which have not been fixed in the current release. You probably want to
get the most up to date version of this from ftp.sendmail.org in /pub/sendmail/KNOWNBUGS.
For descriptions of bugs that have been fixed, see the file RELEASE_NOTES
(in the root directory of the sendmail distribution). This list is not
guaranteed to be complete.
-
Null bytes are not handled properly in headers. Sendmail should handle
full binary data. As it stands, it handles all values in the body, but
only 0x01-0x80 and 0xA0-0xFF in the header. Notably missing is 0x00, which
would require a major restructuring of the code -- for example, almost
no C library support could be used to handle strings.
-
Duplicate error messages. Sometimes identical, duplicate error messages
can be generated. As near as I can tell, this is rare and relatively innocuous.
-
$c (hop count) macro improperly set. The $c macro is supposed to contain
the current hop count, for use when calling a mailer. This macro is initialized
too early, and is always zero (or the value of the -c command line flag,
if any). This macro will probably be removed entirely in a future release;
I don't believe there are any mailers left that require it.
-
If you EXPN a list or user that has a program mailer, the output of EXPN
will include ``@local.host.name''. You can't actually mail to this address.
It's not clear what the right behaviour is in this circumstance.
-
\231 considered harmful. Header addresses that have the \231 character
(and possibly others in the range \201 - \237) behave in odd and usually
unexpected ways.
-
accept() problem on SVR4. Apparently, the sendmail daemon loop (doing accept()s
on the network) can get into a wierd state on SVR4; it starts logging ``SYSERR:
getrequests: accept: Protocol Error''. The workaround is to kill and restart
the sendmail daemon. We don't have an SVR4 system at Berkeley that carries
more than token mail load, so I can't validate this. It is likely to be
a glitch in the sockets emulation, since "Protocol Error" is not possible
error code with Berkeley TCP/IP. I've also had someone report the message
``sendmail: accept: SIOCGPGRP failed errno 22'' on an SVR4 system. This
message is not in the sendmail source code, so I assume it is also a bug
in the sockets emulation. (Errno 22 is EINVAL "Invalid Argument" on all
the systems I have available, including Solaris 2.x.) Apparently, this
problem is due to linking -lc before -lsocket; if you are having this problem,
check your Makefile.
-
accept() problem on Linux. Apparently, the accept() in sendmail daemon
loop can return ETIMEDOUT and cause sendmail to sleep for 5 seconds during
which time no new connections will be accepted. An error is reported to
syslog: Jun 9 17:14:12 hostname sendmail[207]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): getrequests:
accept: Connection timed out "Connection timed out" is not documented as
a valid return from accept(2) and this is believed to be a bug in the Linux
kernel.
-
Excessive mailing list nesting can run out of file descriptors. If you
have a mailing list that includes lots of other mailing lists, each of
which has a separate owner, you can run out of file descriptors. Each mailing
list with a separate owner uses one open file descriptor (prior to 8.6.6
it was three open file descriptors per list). This is particularly egregious
if you have your connection cache set to be large.
-
Connection caching breaks if you pass the port number as an argument. If
you have a definition such as: Mport, P=[IPC], F=kmDFMuX, S=11/31, R=21,
M=2100000, T=DNS/RFC822/SMTP, A=IPC [127.0.0.1] $h (i.e., where $h is the
port number instead of the host name) the connection caching code will
break because it won't notice that two messages addressed to different
ports should use different connections.
-
ESMTP SIZE underestimates the size of a message Sendmail makes no allowance
for headers that it adds, nor does it account for the SMTP on-the-wire
\r\n expansion. It probably doesn't allow for 8->7 bit MIME conversions
either. (Version 8.25, last updated 6/13/97)